Compare

The template only earns its keep if you actually put two cases next to each other.

This is the reason every teardown answers the same questions in the same order. Put a luxury house beside a console platform and the differences stop being vibes — one is refusing sales to protect a price, the other is selling below cost to collect a toll, and both are defending a moat.

Case ACase B

Beauty · Puig (majority owner since 2020)

Charlotte Tilbury

A prestige makeup and skincare brand built on a working makeup artist's name, sold by the look rather than the product, and majority-owned since 2020 by the Spanish fragrance house Puig.

Technology · NASDAQ: AMZN

Amazon

Runs a near-breakeven retail operation at enormous scale, and earns essentially all of its profit from renting out the two things that operation forced it to build — computing capacity and shelf placement.

The thesis in one line

Charlotte Tilbury did not sell lipstick. She sold the twenty years it took her to know which one to put on you.

The store is not the business. The store is the customer acquisition cost for the businesses.

Verdict

Watch it

Own it

Moat

Narrow

Brand · Distribution

Wide

Scale economics · Network effects · Process power · Switching costs

Porter's five forces

Competitive rivalry

Threat of new entrants

Threat of substitutes

Buyer power

Supplier power

Competitive rivalry

Threat of new entrants

Threat of substitutes

Buyer power

Supplier power

Headline figures

Reported valuation at sale: ≈ £1.2B
Looks at the first counter: 10
Brand revenue: ≈ £500M+
Years as a working artist before launch: ≈ 20

Net sales: $638B
AWS share of operating income: ~58%
Retail operating margin: ~5.4%
Third-party share of units: ~60%

Unit economics

One Pillow Talk lipstick, from the brand's side of the invoice (illustrative — the company does not publish product-level figures)

The rose-gold case costs more than the pigment inside it, and the name on the case is worth more than both. The same lipstick sold on the brand's own site keeps the retailer's £13 as well — which is why the company spent its first years making the website feel like a private lesson.

One $50 third-party item sold through Amazon

Amazon captures roughly 38% of the sale price and carries none of the inventory risk. The seller took the risk, paid for the warehouse, and then paid again to be found in a search of Amazon's own catalogue.

What would change her mind

If Puig's makeup segment returns to double-digit growth in 2026 with margin expanding at the same time, the US slowdown was cyclical and the brand has the second act I doubt. If instead growth returns only through price, the brand is harvesting its own credibility, and the moat is narrower than even I am calling it.

If AWS revenue growth falls below 15% for two consecutive quarters while segment operating margin also declines, the cloud business is being commoditised rather than merely contested, and the capex is being spent defending share rather than buying growth. That combination — decelerating growth and compressing margin at the same time — breaks the thesis outright. A single weak quarter on either measure alone does not.

1 mechanism in common

own the customer