Skip to content
The Founder's Notes

Compare

The template only earns its keep if you actually put two cases next to each other.

This is the reason every teardown answers the same questions in the same order. Put a luxury house beside a console platform and the differences stop being vibes — one is refusing sales to protect a price, the other is selling below cost to collect a toll, and both are defending a moat.

Luxury · EPA: RMS

Hermès

A sixth-generation family-controlled French house that makes leather goods by hand in its own French workshops, sells them almost exclusively through its own stores, and deliberately produces fewer of them than people want to buy.

Technology · NASDAQ: AMZN

Amazon

Runs a near-breakeven retail operation at enormous scale, and earns essentially all of its profit from renting out the two things that operation forced it to build — computing capacity and shelf placement.

The thesis in one line

Every other company asks how much it can sell. Hermès asks how much it can make, and then makes slightly less.
The store is not the business. The store is the customer acquisition cost for the businesses.

Verdict

Own it
Own it

Moat

Wide

Brand · Process power · Scale economics

Wide

Scale economics · Network effects · Process power · Switching costs

Porter's five forces

Competitive rivalry
Threat of new entrants
Threat of substitutes
Buyer power
Supplier power
Competitive rivalry
Threat of new entrants
Threat of substitutes
Buyer power
Supplier power

Headline figures

Operating margin
41.0%
Artisans per bag
1
Net cash
€12.8B
Years under family control
189
Net sales
$638B
AWS share of operating income
~58%
Retail operating margin
~5.4%
Third-party share of units
~60%

Unit economics

One Birkin 30, Togo leather

The bag is one of very few consumer products that reliably resells above its original price. That single fact does more work than any advertising campaign: it converts the purchase from consumption into acquisition, and it means the client's downside is not the price — it is not being offered one.

One $50 third-party item sold through Amazon

Amazon captures roughly 38% of the sale price and carries none of the inventory risk. The seller took the risk, paid for the warehouse, and then paid again to be found in a search of Amazon's own catalogue.

What would change her mind

If Leather Goods and Saddlery growth at constant currency falls below 5% for two consecutive years while new workshops are still opening, the constraint has moved from supply to demand — and the entire thesis inverts, because a capacity-led model that runs out of buyers is just an expensive factory. A secondary trigger: a binding legal or regulatory ruling against tying Birkin allocation to other purchases would dismantle the mechanism that converts scarcity into cross-category revenue.
If AWS revenue growth falls below 15% for two consecutive quarters while segment operating margin also declines, the cloud business is being commoditised rather than merely contested, and the capex is being spent defending share rather than buying growth. That combination — decelerating growth and compressing margin at the same time — breaks the thesis outright. A single weak quarter on either measure alone does not.

1 mechanism in common

vertical integration