Skip to content
The Founder's Notes

Founder index · Nike · 1964–2004, chairman to 2016

Phil Knight

The lesson that travels

A company can be a distributor for years and still be a brand underneath, and the moment to find out is when the supplier walks away.

Knight was a middle-distance runner at Oregon who wrote a Stanford business-school paper in 1962 arguing that Japanese running shoes could do to Adidas what Japanese cameras had done to German ones. He then went to Kobe, told the executives at Onitsuka that he represented an American distributor called Blue Ribbon Sports, and took an order. The company did not exist until he got home. His old coach Bill Bowerman put up half of the first thousand dollars, and for eight years Knight sold Tigers out of the boot of a Plymouth Valiant at track meets while keeping his day job as an accountant, because the shoe business could not pay him.

The decision that made Nike was forced rather than chosen. Onitsuka, suspicious that its distributor wanted more, began courting other American partners, and in 1971 Knight had a swoosh drawn for thirty-five dollars and a name picked from a dream one of his employees had, and shipped shoes under his own label before the split was final. The lawsuit that followed nearly ended the company; the verdict in 1974 that let Blue Ribbon keep its designs is the reason there is a Nike at all. What followed is the part everyone knows — the waffle sole, the Jordan contract Knight almost did not approve, and a demand-creation budget that outgrew the shoes it was supposed to sell.

The record has its darker passages. Through the 1990s Nike became the public face of sweatshop manufacturing, and Knight's 1998 speech admitting that the swoosh had become 'synonymous with slave wages' was the first time the company took the criticism as its own problem rather than a supplier's. He was also slow to hand over: the 2004 succession to an outsider lasted eighteen months, and the company reverted to insiders afterwards. Shoe Dog, his memoir, is unusually honest about how close the whole thing came to failing, and is the source most of this case leans on.

§01The hard calls

  1. 1964

    Keep the accounting job and sell shoes at weekends rather than commit full-time to a business with no margin.

    Kept the company alive on borrowed money for the better part of a decade. The slowness was the strategy; there was no capital for anything faster.

  2. 1971

    Ship shoes under a new name, with a new logo, before the Onitsuka relationship was formally over.

    Provoked the lawsuit that could have closed the company and instead confirmed Nike as its own brand. The moment the distributor became a company.

  3. 1984

    Approve a rookie's endorsement at a price that swallowed the basketball budget, over the objection of half the room.

    Air Jordan sold roughly $126 million in its first year against a target of $3 million. The Jordan Brand alone now clears several billion dollars a year.

  4. 1998

    Stand up in Washington and take responsibility for factory conditions Nike did not legally own.

    Raised the minimum age and audited the supply chain; did not end the criticism, but ended the argument that it was somebody else's problem.

  5. 2004

    Hand the chief executive's job to an outsider from Johnson & Johnson.

    Reversed within two years. The company has promoted from inside ever since, which is either a lesson about culture or a lesson about founders who cannot let go. Knight would say both.

One of these is set up as a tutorial — you make the call before you find out what Phil did.

Face the decision