Case 30 — Abercrombie & Fitch · Fran Horowitz · 2017
The name is famous and toxic. Do you sell the company, go back to the teenager, or keep the name and change who it is for?
You have been chief executive for three months. The company you run was the most desirable brand in the American mall fifteen years ago and was named its least-liked retailer last year. Revenue has fallen from about $4.5B to $3.3B in four years. The previous chief executive's line that 'a lot of people don't belong' in the clothes is the first thing anyone says about the brand. The logos were removed from the product in 2014 and sales fell anyway. Hollister, the cheaper teen brand you used to run, is holding up; Abercrombie is not. The shares are in the low teens, the board has taken calls from American Eagle and two private-equity firms, and the flagship stores on Fifth Avenue and Savile Row are bleeding rent.
Choose before you scroll. The answer is hidden until you commit.
§02 — More forks
- Lululemon · 1998You have one store, no ad budget, and a pair of yoga pants that costs four times what anyone pays today. How do you price it?
- Nike · 1984You can sign five established NBA players, or spend the whole basketball budget on one rookie who would rather sign with your competitor. Which?
- Amazon · 2000Do you let outside sellers compete with you, on your own product pages, for your own customers?
- Glossier · 2023The thing that made your brand special is the thing now capping its growth. Do you break your own rule?